Ecm biofilms ftc

in an initial decision announced today, the federal trade commission’s chief administrative law judge (alj), d. michael chappell, ruled that plastics additive manufacturer ecm biofilms, inc. violated the ftc act by deceptively claiming, and providing others with the means to claim, that plastics treated with ecm additives (ecm plastics) would … May 03, 2014 · ECM Biofilms is also under fire for false claims the FTC alleged it made. That case is pending . A typical claim cited as misleading in APM's marketing materials reads: “Using an additive from ECM Biofllms (ecmbiofllms.com), our biodegradable bags break down completely when in contact with other decomposing materials; in compost bins ... WASHINGTON, Dec. 9, 2015 /PRNewswire/ -- On December 8, 2015, the Federal Trade Commission granted ECM BioFilms' request to stay the Commission's Final Order in the matter of ECM BioFilms, FTC...In an Initial Decision announced February 6, 2015, Chief Administrative Law Judge D. Michael Chappell of the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) held that ECM BioFilms, Inc. d/b/a Enviroplastics ... On October 19, 2015, the Federal Trade Commission issued its Final Decision and Order ("Decision") against ECM Biofilms, an Ohio-based company that produces additives used in plastics manufacturing. See In re ECM Biofilms, FTC Docket No. 9358 (Oct. 19, 2015). A copy of ECM's press release concerning that decision is available here .Feb 12, 2015 · in his initial decision in the case of the ftc versus ecm biofilms, the federal trade commission's chief administrative law judge d. michael chappell ruled that plastics additive manufacturer ecm biofilms inc. violated the ftc act by deceptively claiming, and providing others with the means to claim, that plastics treated with ecm additives would … Oct 20, 2015 · ECM Biofilms’ attorney says the FTC’s final order effectively bans the term “biodegradable.” “This is an egregious instance of abuse of agency discretion,” said Jonathan Emord of Emord & Associates, the firm representing ECM Biofilms. ECM BIOFILMS, INC., Petitioner v. FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Federal Trade Commission FTC Docket No. 9358 CORRECTED BRIEF OF THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION Of Counsel: J AMES K OHM F RANK G ORMAN K ATHERINE J OHNSON F EDERAL T RADE C OMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20580 D AVID C. S HONKAHe ruled that plastics additive manufacturer ECM Biofilms, Inc. violated the FTC Act by deceptively claiming, and providing others with the means to claim, that plastics treated with ECM additives would completely biodegrade in a landfill within nine months to five years, and that tests proved this claim.The ECM case is scheduled for trial before an Administrative Law Judge in June 2014, at which ECM and the FTC will likely present evidence on the biodegradation nature of landfills and the suitability of the ATSM D5511 test method. The suitability of ECM’s marketing claims will hang in the balance. On October 19, 2015, the Federal Trade Commission issued its Final Decision and Order ("Decision") against ECM Biofilms, an Ohio-based company that produces additives used in plastics manufacturing. See In re ECM Biofilms, FTC Docket No. 9358 (Oct. 19, 2015). A copy of ECM's press release concerning that decision is available here .FTC rules against ECM Biofilms for making false biodegradable claims European Bioplastics is not the only one that is slugging it out with would-be greenwashers; the Federal Trade Commission just fought—and, for now, won—a similar battle in the United States. Karen Laird | Oct 27, 2015Nov 08, 2013 · That is the takeaway from the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) recent six enforcement actions against companies making false claims regarding biodegradability and recyclability. In one case, ECM Biofilms and two of its customers—shopping bag maker American Plastic Manufacturing and golf tee maker CHAMP—were caught making false claims ... WASHINGTON, Dec. 9, 2015 /PRNewswire/ -- On December 8, 2015, the Federal Trade Commission granted ECM BioFilms' request to stay the Commission's Final Order in the matter of ECM BioFilms, FTC...The FTC, on the other hand, pointed to thirteen tests that, it alleged, indicate that ECM's additive does not accelerate biodegradation. Both ECM and the FTC relied on surveys to establish consumer...May 03, 2014 · ECM Biofilms is also under fire for false claims the FTC alleged it made. That case is pending . A typical claim cited as misleading in APM's marketing materials reads: “Using an additive from ECM Biofllms (ecmbiofllms.com), our biodegradable bags break down completely when in contact with other decomposing materials; in compost bins ... In an Initial Decision announced February 6, 2015, [enhanced version available to lexis.com subscribers], Chief Administrative Law Judge D. Michael Chappell of the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) held that ECM BioFilms, Inc. d/b/a Enviroplastics International (“ECM”) made false and unsubstantiated claims that plastics made with its additive “would completely biodegrade, including in ... Jan 28, 2015 · Washington, D.C. – On January 28, 2015, Federal Trade Commission Chief Administrative Law Judge D. Michael Chappell issued a precedent setting decision in the case of FTC v. ECM BioFilms, FTC Docket No. 9358. In his decision, Judge Chappell held ECM’s claim that its plastics additive, ECM MasterBatch Pellets™, causes plastics to biodegrade… See In re ECM Biofilms, FTC Docket No. 9358 (Oct. 19, 2015). Under that standard, bananas, oranges, wood, and even paper (all understood by scientists to be intrinsically biodegradable) are not ...Mar 16, 2017 · ECM BioFilms manufactures an additive that it claims accelerates the rate at which plastic biodegrades. In 2013, the Federal Trade Commission filed an administrative complaint, claiming that several of ECM’s biodegradability claims were deceptive. ECM BioFilms, Inc. manufactures an additive that it claims accelerates the rate at which plastic biodegrades. In October 2013, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) filed an administrative complaint against ECM, which alleged that several of ECM's biodegradability claims were deceptive.Feb 09, 2015 · The Federal Trade Commission’s Chief Administrative Law Judge (ALJ), D. Michael Chappell has issued an initial decision in the case of the FTC versus ECM BioFilms. He ruled that plastics additive manufacturer ECM Biofilms, Inc. violated the FTC Act by deceptively claiming, and providing others with the means to claim, that plastics treated ... The Federal Trade Commission announced its Opinion and Final Order against Ohio-based ECM BioFilms, Inc., finding that the company acted deceptively by making false and unsubstantiated environmental claims about its product, a chemical additive that supposedly would make treated plastics biodegrade in a landfill within nine months to five years or within a reasonably short period of time, as ...On October 19, 2015, the Federal Trade Commission issued its Final Decision and Order ("Decision") against ECM Biofilms, an Ohio-based company that produces additives used in plastics manufacturing. See In re ECM Biofilms, FTC Docket No. 9358 (Oct. 19, 2015). A copy of ECM's press release concerning that decision is available here ./PRNewswire/ -- On January 28, 2015, Federal Trade Commission Chief Administrative Law Judge D. Michael Chappell issued a precedent setting decision in the... what does girl mean in spanish Oct 23, 2015 · On October 20, 2015, the U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC) issued an opinion and order holding that ECM BioFilms, Inc., a manufacturer of plastic additives, had made false or misleading claims about the biodegradability of plastics containing the additive, but the opinion and order also appeared to retreat from Green Guides standards for biodegradability claims put in place in 2012. ECM BioFilms, FTC Docket No. 9358. In his decision, Judge Chappell held ECM’s claim that its plastics additive, ECM MasterBatch Pellets tm, causes plastics to biodegrade was supported by competent and reliable scientific evidence. He rejected FTC’s challenge to that claim. The Federal Trade Commission recently announced enforcement actions against six companies — five of which address biodegradable plastic claims for the first time — as part of the agency’s ongoing crackdown on false and misleading environmental claims.The cases include a complaint against a biofilms company that claims its additive makes ... In the Matter of ECM BioFilms, Inc., a corporation, also doing business as Enviroplastics International FTC Matter/File Number 122 3118 Docket Number 9358 Case Timeline March 16, 2017 File Opinion of the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals Denying ECM Biofilms' Petition for Review of the Commission's Opinion (210.31 KB) May 5, 2016 File The ECM case is scheduled for trial before an Administrative Law Judge in June 2014, at which ECM and the FTC will likely present evidence on the biodegradation nature of landfills and the suitability of the ATSM D5511 test method. The suitability of ECM’s marketing claims will hang in the balance. ECM Biofilms, Inc. Settles with FTC May 2017 Written By: Adrian Hong ECM Biofilms (ECM), our biodegradable additive manufacturer, has finally settled their dispute with the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) regarding how the company can market is biodegradable additive. This On January 28, 2015, Federal Trade Commission Chief Administrative Law Judge D. Michael Chappell issued a precedent setting decision in the case of FTC v. ECM BioFilms, FTC Docket No. 9358. In his decision, Judge Chappell held ECM’s claim that its plastics additive, ECM The Federal Trade Commission recently announced enforcement actions against six companies — five of which address biodegradable plastic claims for the first time — as part of the agency’s ongoing crackdown on false and misleading environmental claims.The cases include a complaint against a biofilms company that claims its additive makes its plastic products biodegradable, as well as four ... Oct 23, 2015 · On October 20, 2015, the U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC) issued an opinion and order holding that ECM BioFilms, Inc., a manufacturer of plastic additives, had made false or misleading claims about the biodegradability of plastics containing the additive, but the opinion and order also appeared to retreat from Green Guides standards for biodegradability claims put in place in 2012. ECM BioFilms, FTC Docket No. 9358. In his decision, Judge Chappell held ECM's claim that its plastics additive, ECM MasterBatch Pellets tm, causes plastics to biodegrade was supported by competent and reliable scientific evidence. He rejected FTC's challenge to that claim.ECM BioFilms, Inc. manufactures an additive that it claims accelerates the rate at which plastic biodegrades. In October 2013, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) filed an administrative complaint against ECM, which alleged that several of ECM's biodegradability claims were deceptive.Jan 02, 2018 · And the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit’s ruling in ECM BioFilms v. FTC offers insights for companies making representations about biodegradability. Takeaway. In 2017 the FTC played an important role in framing the conversation about how established consumer protection standards apply as technologies evolve. Oct 27, 2015 · FTC rules against ECM Biofilms for making false biodegradable claims European Bioplastics is not the only one that is slugging it out with would-be greenwashers; the Federal Trade Commission just fought—and, for now, won—a similar battle in the United States. Karen Laird | Oct 27, 2015 lake ray hubbard drowning May 03, 2014 · ECM Biofilms is also under fire for false claims the FTC alleged it made. That case is pending . A typical claim cited as misleading in APM's marketing materials reads: “Using an additive from ECM Biofllms (ecmbiofllms.com), our biodegradable bags break down completely when in contact with other decomposing materials; in compost bins ... The ECM case is scheduled for trial before an Administrative Law Judge in June 2014, at which ECM and the FTC will likely present evidence on the biodegradation nature of landfills and the suitability of the ATSM D5511 test method. The suitability of ECM’s marketing claims will hang in the balance. May 03, 2014 · ECM Biofilms is also under fire for false claims the FTC alleged it made. That case is pending . A typical claim cited as misleading in APM's marketing materials reads: “Using an additive from ECM Biofllms (ecmbiofllms.com), our biodegradable bags break down completely when in contact with other decomposing materials; in compost bins ... The Federal Trade Commission recently announced enforcement actions against six companies — five of which address biodegradable plastic claims for the first time — as part of the agency's ongoing crackdown on false and misleading environmental claims.The cases include a complaint against a biofilms company that claims its additive makes its ...Mar 16, 2017 · ECM BioFilms manufactures an additive that it claims accelerates the rate at which plastic biodegrades. In 2013, the Federal Trade Commission filed an administrative complaint, claiming that several of ECM’s biodegradability claims were deceptive. Jan 28, 2015 · Washington, D.C. – On January 28, 2015, Federal Trade Commission Chief Administrative Law Judge D. Michael Chappell issued a precedent setting decision in the case of FTC v. ECM BioFilms, FTC Docket No. 9358. In his decision, Judge Chappell held ECM’s claim that its plastics additive, ECM MasterBatch Pellets™, causes plastics to biodegrade… Oct 22, 2015 · By Peter A. Arhangelsky, Esq. On October 19, 2015, the Federal Trade Commission issued its Final Decision and Order (“Decision”) against ECM Biofilms, an Ohio-based company that produces additives used in plastics manufacturing. See In re ECM Biofilms, FTC Docket No. 9358 (Oct. 19, 2015). A copy of ECM’s press release concerning that decision is The Federal Trade Commission announced its Opinion and Final Order against Ohio-based ECM BioFilms, Inc., finding that the company acted deceptively by making false and unsubstantiated environmental claims about its product, a chemical additive that supposedly would make treated plastics biodegrade in a landfill within nine months to five years or within a reasonably short period of time, as ...in an initial decision announced today, the federal trade commission’s chief administrative law judge (alj), d. michael chappell, ruled that plastics additive manufacturer ecm biofilms, inc. violated the ftc act by deceptively claiming, and providing others with the means to claim, that plastics treated with ecm additives (ecm plastics) would … One company in particular, ECM Biofilms, Inc., also used its own “Certificates of Biodegradability of Plastic Products” and provided deceptive marketing materials to distributors. The FTC also announced an enforcement action against AJM Packaging Corporation, a paper goods company, in violation of a pre-existing 1994 consent order barring ... By Peter A. Arhangelsky, Esq.. On October 19, 2015, the Federal Trade Commission issued its Final Decision and Order ("Decision") against ECM Biofilms, an Ohio-based company that produces additives used in plastics manufacturing. See In re ECM Biofilms, FTC Docket No. 9358 (Oct. 19, 2015). A copy of ECM's press release concerning that decision is available here.The ECM case is scheduled for trial before an Administrative Law Judge in June 2014, at which ECM and the FTC will likely present evidence on the biodegradation nature of landfills and the suitability of the ATSM D5511 test method. The suitability of ECM’s marketing claims will hang in the balance. Jan 02, 2018 · And the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit’s ruling in ECM BioFilms v. FTC offers insights for companies making representations about biodegradability. Takeaway. In 2017 the FTC played an important role in framing the conversation about how established consumer protection standards apply as technologies evolve. On January 28, 2015, Federal Trade Commission Chief Administrative Law Judge D. Michael Chappell issued a precedent setting decision in the case of FTC v. ECM BioFilms, FTC Docket No. 9358. In his decision, Judge Chappell held ECM’s claim that its plastics additive, ECM Nov 08, 2013 · That is the takeaway from the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) recent six enforcement actions against companies making false claims regarding biodegradability and recyclability. In one case, ECM Biofilms and two of its customers—shopping bag maker American Plastic Manufacturing and golf tee maker CHAMP—were caught making false claims ... Mar 16, 2017 · ECM BioFilms manufactures an additive that it claims accelerates the rate at which plastic biodegrades. In 2013, the Federal Trade Commission filed an administrative complaint, claiming that several of ECM’s biodegradability claims were deceptive. ECM Biofilms, Inc. Settles with FTC May 2017 Written By: Adrian Hong ECM Biofilms (ECM), our biodegradable additive manufacturer, has finally settled their dispute with the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) regarding how the company can market is biodegradable additive. This In the Matter of ECM BioFilms, Inc., a corporation, also doing business as Enviroplastics International FTC Matter/File Number 122 3118 Docket Number 9358 Case Timeline March 16, 2017 File Opinion of the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals Denying ECM Biofilms' Petition for Review of the Commission's Opinion (210.31 KB) May 5, 2016 FileMay 03, 2014 · ECM Biofilms is also under fire for false claims the FTC alleged it made. That case is pending . A typical claim cited as misleading in APM's marketing materials reads: “Using an additive from ECM Biofllms (ecmbiofllms.com), our biodegradable bags break down completely when in contact with other decomposing materials; in compost bins ... ECM Biofilms, Inc. Settles with FTC May 2017 Written By: Adrian Hong ECM Biofilms (ECM), our biodegradable additive manufacturer, has finally settled their dispute with the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) regarding how the company can market is biodegradable additive. This Nov 10, 2014 · FTC filed a complaint against ECM BioFilms, which makes a plastics additive that the Ohio company claims will cause plastic to break down “in nearly all landfills.” That, the agency alleges ... The FTC, on the other hand, pointed to thirteen tests that, it alleged, indicate that ECM's additive does not accelerate biodegradation. Both ECM and the FTC relied on surveys to establish consumer...The Federal Trade Commission announced its Opinion and Final Order against Ohio-based ECM BioFilms, Inc., finding that the company acted deceptively by making false and unsubstantiated environmental claims about its product, a chemical additive that supposedly would make treated plastics biodegrade in a landfill within nine months to five years or within a reasonably short period of time, as ...in an initial decision announced today, the federal trade commission’s chief administrative law judge (alj), d. michael chappell, ruled that plastics additive manufacturer ecm biofilms, inc. violated the ftc act by deceptively claiming, and providing others with the means to claim, that plastics treated with ecm additives (ecm plastics) would … The Federal Trade Commission recently announced enforcement actions against six companies — five of which address biodegradable plastic claims for the first time — as part of the agency’s ongoing crackdown on false and misleading environmental claims.The cases include a complaint against a biofilms company that claims its additive makes its plastic products biodegradable, as well as four ... The Federal Trade Commission has ruled that ECM BioFilms acted deceptively by making false and unsubstantiated environmental claims by saying its product is biodegradable. ECM BioFilms claimed its product, a chemical additive, would make treated plastics biodegrade in a landfill within nine months to five years.May 03, 2014 · ECM Biofilms is also under fire for false claims the FTC alleged it made. That case is pending . A typical claim cited as misleading in APM's marketing materials reads: “Using an additive from ECM Biofllms (ecmbiofllms.com), our biodegradable bags break down completely when in contact with other decomposing materials; in compost bins ... On January 28, 2015, Federal Trade Commission Chief Administrative Law Judge D. Michael Chappell issued a precedent setting decision in the case of FTC v. ECM BioFilms, FTC Docket No. 9358. In his decision, Judge Chappell held ECM’s claim that its plastics additive, ECM The FTC, on the other hand, pointed to thirteen tests that, it alleged, indicate that ECM's additive does not accelerate biodegradation. Both ECM and the FTC relied on surveys to establish consumer...Nov 08, 2013 · That is the takeaway from the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) recent six enforcement actions against companies making false claims regarding biodegradability and recyclability. In one case, ECM Biofilms and two of its customers—shopping bag maker American Plastic Manufacturing and golf tee maker CHAMP—were caught making false claims ... Jul 22, 2022 · In the FTC administrative law judge’s January decision, Judge D. Michael Chappell ruled that ECM Biofilms, maker of an additive that accelerates the biodegradation of conventional plastics, had proven the effectiveness of its product based on generally accepted, competent and reliable scientific evidence, including more than 20 gas evolution ... Mar 16, 2017 · ECM BioFilms manufactures an additive that it claims accelerates the rate at which plastic biodegrades. In 2013, the Federal Trade Commission filed an administrative complaint, claiming that several of ECM’s biodegradability claims were deceptive. Dec 04, 2015 · Petitioner: ECM BIOFILMS, INC, dba Enviroplastics International: Respondent: FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION: Case Number: 15-4339: Filed: December 4, 2015: Court: The ECM case is scheduled for trial before an Administrative Law Judge in June 2014, at which ECM and the FTC will likely present evidence on the biodegradation nature of landfills and the suitability of the ATSM D5511 test method. The suitability of ECM’s marketing claims will hang in the balance. The Federal Trade Commission recently announced enforcement actions against six companies — five of which address biodegradable plastic claims for the first time — as part of the agency’s ongoing crackdown on false and misleading environmental claims.The cases include a complaint against a biofilms company that claims its additive makes its plastic products biodegradable, as well as four ... Oct 21, 2015 · The FTC also took action against six companies — including ECM Biofilms, which makes an additive that accelerates biodegradation of plastics — stating that the companies made false environmental marketing claims. The FTC administrative law judge ruled in January that ECM Biofilms' additive proved effective biodegradability. May 03, 2014 · ECM Biofilms is also under fire for false claims the FTC alleged it made. That case is pending . A typical claim cited as misleading in APM's marketing materials reads: “Using an additive from ECM Biofllms (ecmbiofllms.com), our biodegradable bags break down completely when in contact with other decomposing materials; in compost bins ... In an Initial Decision announced February 6, 2015, Chief Administrative Law Judge D. Michael Chappell of the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) held that ECM BioFilms, Inc. d/b/a Enviroplastics ... Nov 14, 2013 · The ECM case is scheduled for trial before an Administrative Law Judge in June 2014, at which ECM and the FTC will likely present evidence on the biodegradation nature of landfills and the ... Dec 04, 2015 · Petitioner: ECM BIOFILMS, INC, dba Enviroplastics International: Respondent: FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION: Case Number: 15-4339: Filed: December 4, 2015: Court: ECM BioFilms, Inc. manufactures an additive that it claims accelerates the rate at which plastic biodegrades. In October 2013, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) filed an administrative complaint against ECM, which alleged that several of ECM's biodegradability claims were deceptive.In an Initial Decision announced February 6, 2015, Chief Administrative Law Judge D. Michael Chappell of the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) held that ECM BioFilms, Inc. d/b/a Enviroplastics ... Petitioner: ECM BIOFILMS, INC, dba Enviroplastics International: Respondent: FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION: Case Number: 15-4339: Filed: December 4, 2015: Court:The Federal Trade Commission recently announced enforcement actions against six companies — five of which address biodegradable plastic claims for the first time — as part of the agency's ongoing crackdown on false and misleading environmental claims.The cases include a complaint against a biofilms company that claims its additive makes its ...Petitioner: ECM BIOFILMS, INC, dba Enviroplastics International: Respondent: FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION: Case Number: 15-4339: Filed: December 4, 2015: Court:Oct 23, 2015 · On October 20, 2015, the U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC) issued an opinion and order holding that ECM BioFilms, Inc., a manufacturer of plastic additives, had made false or misleading claims about the biodegradability of plastics containing the additive, but the opinion and order also appeared to retreat from Green Guides standards for biodegradability claims put in place in 2012. Petitioner: ECM BIOFILMS, INC, dba Enviroplastics International: Respondent: FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION: Case Number: 15-4339: Filed: December 4, 2015: Court:Dec 04, 2015 · Petitioner: ECM BIOFILMS, INC, dba Enviroplastics International: Respondent: FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION: Case Number: 15-4339: Filed: December 4, 2015: Court: In an announcement of the action, the FTC said ECM BioFilms Inc., American Plastic Manufacturing, CHAMP, Clear Choice Housewares Inc. and Carnie Cap Inc. all made claims of their plastic being ...In an Initial Decision announced February 6, 2015, Chief Administrative Law Judge D. Michael Chappell of the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) held that ECM BioFilms, Inc. d/b/a Enviroplastics ... ECM BioFilms, FTC Docket No. 9358. In his decision, Judge Chappell held ECM’s claim that its plastics additive, ECM MasterBatch Pellets tm, causes plastics to biodegrade was supported by competent and reliable scientific evidence. He rejected FTC’s challenge to that claim. Mar 16, 2017 · ECM BioFilms manufactures an additive that it claims accelerates the rate at which plastic biodegrades. In 2013, the Federal Trade Commission filed an administrative complaint, claiming that several of ECM’s biodegradability claims were deceptive. in an initial decision announced today, the federal trade commission’s chief administrative law judge (alj), d. michael chappell, ruled that plastics additive manufacturer ecm biofilms, inc. violated the ftc act by deceptively claiming, and providing others with the means to claim, that plastics treated with ecm additives (ecm plastics) would … On October 19, 2015, the Federal Trade Commission issued its Final Decision and Order ("Decision") against ECM Biofilms, an Ohio-based company that produces additives used in plastics manufacturing. See In re ECM Biofilms, FTC Docket No. 9358 (Oct. 19, 2015). A copy of ECM's press release concerning that decision is available here. We ...The Federal Trade Commission recently announced enforcement actions against six companies — five of which address biodegradable plastic claims for the first time — as part of the agency’s ongoing crackdown on false and misleading environmental claims.The cases include a complaint against a biofilms company that claims its additive makes ... In an Initial Decision announced February 6, 2015, Chief Administrative Law Judge D. Michael Chappell of the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) held that ECM BioFilms, Inc. d/b/a Enviroplastics ... In an Initial Decision announced February 6, 2015, Chief Administrative Law Judge D. Michael Chappell of the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) held that ECM BioFilms, Inc. d/b/a Enviroplastics ... Feb 09, 2015 · The Federal Trade Commission’s Chief Administrative Law Judge (ALJ), D. Michael Chappell has issued an initial decision in the case of the FTC versus ECM BioFilms. He ruled that plastics additive manufacturer ECM Biofilms, Inc. violated the FTC Act by deceptively claiming, and providing others with the means to claim, that plastics treated ... On January 28, 2015, Federal Trade Commission Chief Administrative Law Judge D. Michael Chappell issued a precedent setting decision in the case of FTC v. ECM BioFilms, FTC Docket No. 9358. In his decision, Judge Chappell held ECM’s claim that its plastics additive, ECM In the Matter of ECM BioFilms, Inc., a corporation, also doing business as Enviroplastics International FTC Matter/File Number 122 3118 Docket Number 9358 Case Timeline March 16, 2017 File Opinion of the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals Denying ECM Biofilms' Petition for Review of the Commission's Opinion (210.31 KB) May 5, 2016 FileThe ECM case is scheduled for trial before an Administrative Law Judge in June 2014, at which ECM and the FTC will likely present evidence on the biodegradation nature of landfills and the suitability of the ATSM D5511 test method. The suitability of ECM’s marketing claims will hang in the balance. Dec 04, 2015 · Petitioner: ECM BIOFILMS, INC, dba Enviroplastics International: Respondent: FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION: Case Number: 15-4339: Filed: December 4, 2015: Court: can bark monitor tiktok Nov 08, 2013 · That is the takeaway from the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) recent six enforcement actions against companies making false claims regarding biodegradability and recyclability. In one case, ECM Biofilms and two of its customers—shopping bag maker American Plastic Manufacturing and golf tee maker CHAMP—were caught making false claims ... Oct 30, 2015 · On October 19, 2015, the Federal Trade Commission sent a message to companies that promote their plastic products as biodegradable – ruling in a case against Ohio-based ECM Biofilms that a claim of biodegradability of a plastic product requires scientific evidence showing that the product will completely decompose within five years. Oct 22, 2015 · By Peter A. Arhangelsky, Esq. On October 19, 2015, the Federal Trade Commission issued its Final Decision and Order (“Decision”) against ECM Biofilms, an Ohio-based company that produces additives used in plastics manufacturing. See In re ECM Biofilms, FTC Docket No. 9358 (Oct. 19, 2015). A copy of ECM’s press release concerning that decision is The FTC, on the other hand, pointed to thirteen tests that, it alleged, indicate that ECM's additive does not accelerate biodegradation. Both ECM and the FTC relied on surveys to establish consumer...ECM Biofilms Inc., American Plastic Manufacturing Inc., Champ, Clear Choice Housewares Inc., Carnie Cap Inc. and AJM Packaging Corp., were all hit with administrative or federal court complaints ... ECM Biofilms, Inc. Settles with FTC May 2017 Written By: Adrian Hong ECM Biofilms (ECM), our biodegradable additive manufacturer, has finally settled their dispute with the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) regarding how the company can market is biodegradable additive. This FTC rules against ECM Biofilms for making false biodegradable claims European Bioplastics is not the only one that is slugging it out with would-be greenwashers; the Federal Trade Commission just fought—and, for now, won—a similar battle in the United States. Karen Laird | Oct 27, 2015ECM Biofilms, Inc. Settles with FTC May 2017 Written By: Adrian Hong ECM Biofilms (ECM), our biodegradable additive manufacturer, has finally settled their dispute with the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) regarding how the company can market is biodegradable additive. This The ECM case is scheduled for trial before an Administrative Law Judge in June 2014, at which ECM and the FTC will likely present evidence on the biodegradation nature of landfills and the suitability of the ATSM D5511 test method. The suitability of ECM’s marketing claims will hang in the balance. ECM Biofilms, Inc. Settles with FTC May 2017 Written By: Adrian Hong ECM Biofilms (ECM), our biodegradable additive manufacturer, has finally settled their dispute with the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) regarding how the company can market is biodegradable additive. This In the Matter of ECM BioFilms, Inc., a corporation, also doing business as Enviroplastics International FTC Matter/File Number 122 3118 Docket Number 9358 Case Timeline March 16, 2017 File Opinion of the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals Denying ECM Biofilms' Petition for Review of the Commission's Opinion (210.31 KB) May 5, 2016 FileSee In re ECM Biofilms, FTC Docket No. 9358 (Oct. 19, 2015). Under that standard, bananas, oranges, wood, and even paper (all understood by scientists to be intrinsically biodegradable) are not ...The Federal Trade Commission recently announced enforcement actions against six companies — five of which address biodegradable plastic claims for the first time — as part of the agency’s ongoing crackdown on false and misleading environmental claims.The cases include a complaint against a biofilms company that claims its additive makes ... Oct 30, 2015 · On October 19, 2015, the Federal Trade Commission sent a message to companies that promote their plastic products as biodegradable – ruling in a case against Ohio-based ECM Biofilms that a claim of biodegradability of a plastic product requires scientific evidence showing that the product will completely decompose within five years. Oct 30, 2015 · On October 19, 2015, the Federal Trade Commission sent a message to companies that promote their plastic products as biodegradable – ruling in a case against Ohio-based ECM Biofilms that a claim of biodegradability of a plastic product requires scientific evidence showing that the product will completely decompose within five years. Mar 16, 2017 · ECM BioFilms manufactures an additive that it claims accelerates the rate at which plastic biodegrades. In 2013, the Federal Trade Commission filed an administrative complaint, claiming that several of ECM’s biodegradability claims were deceptive. On October 20, 2015, the United States Federal Trade Commission (FTC) released a Final Order with a corresponding Opinion against ECM BioFilms, Inc. (ECM) stating that ECM made false and unsubstantiated environmental claims that its additives for plastics (ECM Plastics) would make treated plastics biodegrade in a landfill. Nov 08, 2013 · Below are some examples of companies that the FTC claims have perpetuated false claims about their products. Ohio company faces FTC scrutiny. ECM Biofilms, Inc. is based in Ohio and markets its additives (which allegedly make plastic products biodegradable) under the trade name MasterBatch Pellets. The Federal Trade Commission recently announced enforcement actions against six companies — five of which address biodegradable plastic claims for the first time — as part of the agency’s ongoing crackdown on false and misleading environmental claims.The cases include a complaint against a biofilms company that claims its additive makes ... Oct 30, 2015 · On October 19, 2015, the Federal Trade Commission sent a message to companies that promote their plastic products as biodegradable – ruling in a case against Ohio-based ECM Biofilms that a claim of biodegradability of a plastic product requires scientific evidence showing that the product will completely decompose within five years. Respondent ECM BioFilms, Inc., is an Ohio corporation with its principal office or place of business at Victoria Place, Suite 225, 100 South Park Place, Painesville, OH 44077. 2.ECM BioFilms, Inc. is a manufacturing company founded in 1998, which is dedicated to developing and revolutionizing the plastics market by offering an additive to standard plastic resins making them biodegradable*. In an Initial Decision announced February 6, 2015, Chief Administrative Law Judge D. Michael Chappell of the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) held that ECM BioFilms, Inc. d/b/a Enviroplastics ... The ECM case is scheduled for trial before an Administrative Law Judge in June 2014, at which ECM and the FTC will likely present evidence on the biodegradation nature of landfills and the suitability of the ATSM D5511 test method. The suitability of ECM’s marketing claims will hang in the balance. In an Initial Decision announced February 6, 2015, Chief Administrative Law Judge D. Michael Chappell of the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) held that ECM BioFilms, Inc. d/b/a Enviroplastics ... In an Initial Decision announced February 6, 2015, [enhanced version available to lexis.com subscribers], Chief Administrative Law Judge D. Michael Chappell of the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) held that ECM BioFilms, Inc. d/b/a Enviroplastics International (“ECM”) made false and unsubstantiated claims that plastics made with its additive “would completely biodegrade, including in ... The ECM case is scheduled for trial before an Administrative Law Judge in June 2014, at which ECM and the FTC will likely present evidence on the biodegradation nature of landfills and the suitability of the ATSM D5511 test method. The suitability of ECM’s marketing claims will hang in the balance. The ECM case is scheduled for trial before an Administrative Law Judge in June 2014, at which ECM and the FTC will likely present evidence on the biodegradation nature of landfills and the suitability of the ATSM D5511 test method. The suitability of ECM’s marketing claims will hang in the balance. ecm biofilms is leading the sustainability movement within the plastics and landfill gas-to-energy industries with an additives for manufacturing biodegradable* plastics-creating an entirely new and greatly desired end-of-life scenario for plastics-and simultaneously opening up exciting new opportunities for energy generation and recycling the …Nov 16, 2015 · Recently the Federal Trade Commission found that ECM BioFilms made false and unsubstantiated environmental claims about its chemical additive product. What makes this opinion notable is the ... Oct 21, 2015 · The FTC also took action against six companies — including ECM Biofilms, which makes an additive that accelerates biodegradation of plastics — stating that the companies made false environmental marketing claims. The FTC administrative law judge ruled in January that ECM Biofilms' additive proved effective biodegradability. ECM BioFilms, Inc. manufactures an additive that it claims accelerates the rate at which plastic biodegrades. In October 2013, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) filed an administrative complaint against ECM, which alleged that several of ECM's biodegradability claims were deceptive.On October 19, 2015, the Federal Trade Commission issued its Final Decision and Order ("Decision") against ECM Biofilms, an Ohio-based company that produces additives used in plastics manufacturing. See In re ECM Biofilms, FTC Docket No. 9358 (Oct. 19, 2015). A copy of ECM's press release concerning that decision is available here. We ...ECM BioFilms, FTC Docket No. 9358. In his decision, Judge Chappell held ECM's claim that its plastics additive, ECM MasterBatch Pellets tm, causes plastics to biodegrade was supported by competent and reliable scientific evidence. He rejected FTC's challenge to that claim.Dec 04, 2015 · Petitioner: ECM BIOFILMS, INC, dba Enviroplastics International: Respondent: FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION: Case Number: 15-4339: Filed: December 4, 2015: Court: Nov 16, 2015 · Recently the Federal Trade Commission found that ECM BioFilms made false and unsubstantiated environmental claims about its chemical additive product. What makes this opinion notable is the ... The Federal Trade Commission recently announced enforcement actions against six companies — five of which address biodegradable plastic claims for the first time — as part of the agency’s ongoing crackdown on false and misleading environmental claims.The cases include a complaint against a biofilms company that claims its additive makes ... On January 28, 2015, Federal Trade Commission Chief Administrative Law Judge D. Michael Chappell issued a precedent setting decision in the case of FTC v. ECM BioFilms, FTC Docket No. 9358. In his decision, Judge Chappell held ECM’s claim that its plastics additive, ECM The FTC, on the other hand, pointed to thirteen tests that, it alleged, indicate that ECM's additive does not accelerate biodegradation. Both ECM and the FTC relied on surveys to establish consumer...The Federal Trade Commission recently announced enforcement actions against six companies — five of which address biodegradable plastic claims for the first time — as part of the agency's ongoing crackdown on false and misleading environmental claims.The cases include a complaint against a biofilms company that claims its additive makes its ...Nov 17, 2015 · On October 20, 2015, the U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC) released a “Final Order and Opinion” against ECM BioFilms, Inc., stating that ECM made false and unsubstantiated environmental claims that its additives for plastics (ECM Plastics) would make treated plastics biodegrade in a landfill. The opinion come two years after FTC issued an ... Jul 22, 2022 · In the FTC administrative law judge’s January decision, Judge D. Michael Chappell ruled that ECM Biofilms, maker of an additive that accelerates the biodegradation of conventional plastics, had proven the effectiveness of its product based on generally accepted, competent and reliable scientific evidence, including more than 20 gas evolution ... Nov 14, 2013 · The ECM case is scheduled for trial before an Administrative Law Judge in June 2014, at which ECM and the FTC will likely present evidence on the biodegradation nature of landfills and the ... May 03, 2014 · ECM Biofilms is also under fire for false claims the FTC alleged it made. That case is pending . A typical claim cited as misleading in APM's marketing materials reads: “Using an additive from ECM Biofllms (ecmbiofllms.com), our biodegradable bags break down completely when in contact with other decomposing materials; in compost bins ... Federal Trade Commission, 600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Mail Stop M-8102B, Washington, DC 20580. The subject line must begin: "ECM BioFilms, Inc., Docket No. 9358, File No. 122 ... "ECM BioFilms, Inc., Docket No. 9358, File No. 122 3118." VIII. This Order will terminate on October 11, 2035, or twenty (20) years from the most recentOn January 28, 2015, Federal Trade Commission Chief Administrative Law Judge D. Michael Chappell issued a precedent setting decision in the case of FTC v. ECM BioFilms, FTC Docket No. 9358. In his decision, Judge Chappell held ECM’s claim that its plastics additive, ECM May 03, 2014 · ECM Biofilms is also under fire for false claims the FTC alleged it made. That case is pending . A typical claim cited as misleading in APM's marketing materials reads: “Using an additive from ECM Biofllms (ecmbiofllms.com), our biodegradable bags break down completely when in contact with other decomposing materials; in compost bins ... pubg radar hack 2022 Nov 17, 2015 · ECM Biofilms, a company that produces additives for plastic products, was recently the target of an FTC suit for false advertising. ECM had developed an additive that, when incorporated into plastic, renders the plastic biodegradable, but the FTC claimed in its suit that ECM hadn’t proved its biodegradability. What followed was a trial-type ... On October 20, 2015, the United States Federal Trade Commission (FTC) released a Final Order with a corresponding Opinion against ECM BioFilms, Inc. (ECM) stating that ECM made false and unsubstantiated environmental claims that its additives for plastics (ECM Plastics) would make treated plastics biodegrade in a landfill. On January 28, 2015, Federal Trade Commission Chief Administrative Law Judge D. Michael Chappell issued a precedent setting decision in the case of FTC v. ECM BioFilms, FTC Docket No. 9358. In his decision, Judge Chappell held ECM’s claim that its plastics additive, ECM May 03, 2014 · ECM Biofilms is also under fire for false claims the FTC alleged it made. That case is pending . A typical claim cited as misleading in APM's marketing materials reads: “Using an additive from ECM Biofllms (ecmbiofllms.com), our biodegradable bags break down completely when in contact with other decomposing materials; in compost bins ... The ECM case is scheduled for trial before an Administrative Law Judge in June 2014, at which ECM and the FTC will likely present evidence on the biodegradation nature of landfills and the suitability of the ATSM D5511 test method. The suitability of ECM’s marketing claims will hang in the balance. The Federal Trade Commission recently announced enforcement actions against six companies — five of which address biodegradable plastic claims for the first time — as part of the agency’s ongoing crackdown on false and misleading environmental claims.The cases include a complaint against a biofilms company that claims its additive makes its plastic products biodegradable, as well as four ... Oct 20, 2015 · The Federal Trade Commission has ruled that ECM BioFilms acted deceptively by making false and unsubstantiated environmental claims by saying its product is biodegradable. ECM BioFilms claimed its product, a chemical additive, would make treated plastics biodegrade in a landfill within nine months to five years. ECM BioFilms, Inc. is a manufacturing company founded in 1998, which is dedicated to developing and revolutionizing the plastics market by offering an additive to standard plastic resins making them biodegradable*. Oct 29, 2013 · The Commission vote to issue the administrative complaint against ECM Biofilms was 4-0. The case will be heard before an administrative law judge at the FTC, with the proceeding scheduled to begin ... Jul 22, 2022 · In the FTC administrative law judge’s January decision, Judge D. Michael Chappell ruled that ECM Biofilms, maker of an additive that accelerates the biodegradation of conventional plastics, had proven the effectiveness of its product based on generally accepted, competent and reliable scientific evidence, including more than 20 gas evolution ... Oct 20, 2015 · ECM Biofilms’ attorney says the FTC’s final order effectively bans the term “biodegradable.” “This is an egregious instance of abuse of agency discretion,” said Jonathan Emord of Emord & Associates, the firm representing ECM Biofilms. Feb 09, 2015 · The Federal Trade Commission’s Chief Administrative Law Judge (ALJ), D. Michael Chappell has issued an initial decision in the case of the FTC versus ECM BioFilms. He ruled that plastics additive manufacturer ECM Biofilms, Inc. violated the FTC Act by deceptively claiming, and providing others with the means to claim, that plastics treated ... Jul 22, 2022 · In the FTC administrative law judge’s January decision, Judge D. Michael Chappell ruled that ECM Biofilms, maker of an additive that accelerates the biodegradation of conventional plastics, had proven the effectiveness of its product based on generally accepted, competent and reliable scientific evidence, including more than 20 gas evolution ... May 03, 2014 · ECM Biofilms is also under fire for false claims the FTC alleged it made. That case is pending . A typical claim cited as misleading in APM's marketing materials reads: “Using an additive from ECM Biofllms (ecmbiofllms.com), our biodegradable bags break down completely when in contact with other decomposing materials; in compost bins ... ECM BioFilms, FTC Docket No. 9358. In his decision, Judge Chappell held ECM’s claim that its plastics additive, ECM MasterBatch Pellets tm, causes plastics to biodegrade was supported by competent and reliable scientific evidence. He rejected FTC’s challenge to that claim. Oct 30, 2015 · On October 19, 2015, the Federal Trade Commission sent a message to companies that promote their plastic products as biodegradable – ruling in a case against Ohio-based ECM Biofilms that a claim of biodegradability of a plastic product requires scientific evidence showing that the product will completely decompose within five years. The FTC had found that several of ECM BioFilms Inc. claims were deceptive, but the company only appealed the commission's decision with regard to one of the claims: that plastic treated with an ... is wholesaling illegal Oct 22, 2015 · By Peter A. Arhangelsky, Esq. On October 19, 2015, the Federal Trade Commission issued its Final Decision and Order (“Decision”) against ECM Biofilms, an Ohio-based company that produces additives used in plastics manufacturing. See In re ECM Biofilms, FTC Docket No. 9358 (Oct. 19, 2015). A copy of ECM’s press release concerning that decision is The ECM case is scheduled for trial before an Administrative Law Judge in June 2014, at which ECM and the FTC will likely present evidence on the biodegradation nature of landfills and the suitability of the ATSM D5511 test method. The suitability of ECM’s marketing claims will hang in the balance. On January 28, 2015, Federal Trade Commission Chief Administrative Law Judge D. Michael Chappell issued a precedent setting decision in the case of FTC v. ECM BioFilms, FTC Docket No. 9358. In his decision, Judge Chappell held ECM’s claim that its plastics additive, ECM Oct 23, 2015 · On October 20, 2015, the U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC) issued an opinion and order holding that ECM BioFilms, Inc., a manufacturer of plastic additives, had made false or misleading claims about the biodegradability of plastics containing the additive, but the opinion and order also appeared to retreat from Green Guides standards for biodegradability claims put in place in 2012. On January 28, 2015, Federal Trade Commission Chief Administrative Law Judge D. Michael Chappell issued a precedent setting decision in the case of FTC v. ECM BioFilms, FTC Docket No. 9358. In his decision, Judge Chappell held ECM’s claim that its plastics additive, ECM On January 28, 2015, Federal Trade Commission Chief Administrative Law Judge D. Michael Chappell issued a precedent setting decision in the case of FTC v. ECM BioFilms, FTC Docket No. 9358. In his decision, Judge Chappell held ECM’s claim that its plastics additive, ECM Jan 02, 2018 · And the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit’s ruling in ECM BioFilms v. FTC offers insights for companies making representations about biodegradability. Takeaway. In 2017 the FTC played an important role in framing the conversation about how established consumer protection standards apply as technologies evolve. On October 20, 2015, the United States Federal Trade Commission (FTC) released a Final Order with a corresponding Opinion against ECM BioFilms, Inc. (ECM) stating that ECM made false and unsubstantiated environmental claims that its additives for plastics (ECM Plastics) would make treated plastics biodegrade in a landfill. Nov 17, 2015 · ECM Biofilms, a company that produces additives for plastic products, was recently the target of an FTC suit for false advertising. ECM had developed an additive that, when incorporated into plastic, renders the plastic biodegradable, but the FTC claimed in its suit that ECM hadn’t proved its biodegradability. What followed was a trial-type ... ECM BioFilms, Inc. manufactures an additive that it claims accelerates the rate at which plastic biodegrades. In October 2013, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) filed an administrative complaint against ECM, which alleged that several of ECM's biodegradability claims were deceptive.Nov 17, 2015 · On October 20, 2015, the U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC) released a “Final Order and Opinion” against ECM BioFilms, Inc., stating that ECM made false and unsubstantiated environmental claims that its additives for plastics (ECM Plastics) would make treated plastics biodegrade in a landfill. The opinion come two years after FTC issued an ... Nov 17, 2015 · On October 20, 2015, the U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC) released a “Final Order and Opinion” against ECM BioFilms, Inc., stating that ECM made false and unsubstantiated environmental claims that its additives for plastics (ECM Plastics) would make treated plastics biodegrade in a landfill. The opinion come two years after FTC issued an ... Oct 22, 2015 · On October 19, 2015, the Federal Trade Commission issued its Final Decision and Order (“Decision”) against ECM Biofilms, an Ohio-based company that produces additives used in plastics manufacturing. See In re ECM Biofilms, FTC Docket No. 9358 (Oct. 19, 2015). A copy of ECM’s press release concerning that decision is available here. The ECM case is scheduled for trial before an Administrative Law Judge in June 2014, at which ECM and the FTC will likely present evidence on the biodegradation nature of landfills and the suitability of the ATSM D5511 test method. The suitability of ECM’s marketing claims will hang in the balance. In the Matter of ECM BioFilms, Inc., a corporation, also doing business as Enviroplastics International FTC Matter/File Number 122 3118 Docket Number 9358 Case Timeline March 16, 2017 File Opinion of the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals Denying ECM Biofilms' Petition for Review of the Commission's Opinion (210.31 KB) May 5, 2016 File Oct 20, 2015 · ECM Biofilms’ attorney says the FTC’s final order effectively bans the term “biodegradable.” “This is an egregious instance of abuse of agency discretion,” said Jonathan Emord of Emord & Associates, the firm representing ECM Biofilms. In an Initial Decision announced February 6, 2015, [enhanced version available to lexis.com subscribers], Chief Administrative Law Judge D. Michael Chappell of the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) held that ECM BioFilms, Inc. d/b/a Enviroplastics International (“ECM”) made false and unsubstantiated claims that plastics made with its additive “would completely biodegrade, including in ... WASHINGTON, Dec. 9, 2015 /PRNewswire/ -- On December 8, 2015, the Federal Trade Commission granted ECM BioFilms' request to stay the Commission's Final Order in the matter of ECM BioFilms, FTC...In an Initial Decision announced February 6, 2015, [enhanced version available to lexis.com subscribers], Chief Administrative Law Judge D. Michael Chappell of the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) held that ECM BioFilms, Inc. d/b/a Enviroplastics International (“ECM”) made false and unsubstantiated claims that plastics made with its additive “would completely biodegrade, including in ... Nov 10, 2014 · FTC filed a complaint against ECM BioFilms, which makes a plastics additive that the Ohio company claims will cause plastic to break down “in nearly all landfills.” That, the agency alleges ... Feb 09, 2015 · The Federal Trade Commission’s Chief Administrative Law Judge (ALJ), D. Michael Chappell has issued an initial decision in the case of the FTC versus ECM BioFilms. He ruled that plastics additive manufacturer ECM Biofilms, Inc. violated the FTC Act by deceptively claiming, and providing others with the means to claim, that plastics treated ... Feb 09, 2015 · The Federal Trade Commission’s Chief Administrative Law Judge (ALJ), D. Michael Chappell has issued an initial decision in the case of the FTC versus ECM BioFilms. He ruled that plastics additive manufacturer ECM Biofilms, Inc. violated the FTC Act by deceptively claiming, and providing others with the means to claim, that plastics treated ... ECM BioFilms, Inc. is a manufacturing company founded in 1998, which is dedicated to developing and revolutionizing the plastics market by offering an additive to standard plastic resins making them biodegradable*. ECM BioFilms, FTC Docket No. 9358. In his decision, Judge Chappell held ECM's claim that its plastics additive, ECM MasterBatch Pellets tm, causes plastics to biodegrade was supported by competent and reliable scientific evidence. He rejected FTC's challenge to that claim.Feb 09, 2015 · The Federal Trade Commission’s Chief Administrative Law Judge (ALJ), D. Michael Chappell has issued an initial decision in the case of the FTC versus ECM BioFilms. He ruled that plastics additive manufacturer ECM Biofilms, Inc. violated the FTC Act by deceptively claiming, and providing others with the means to claim, that plastics treated ... Federal Trade Commission, 600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Mail Stop M-8102B, Washington, DC 20580. The subject line must begin: "ECM BioFilms, Inc., Docket No. 9358, File No. 122 ... "ECM BioFilms, Inc., Docket No. 9358, File No. 122 3118." VIII. This Order will terminate on October 11, 2035, or twenty (20) years from the most recentIn an Initial Decision announced February 6, 2015, [enhanced version available to lexis.com subscribers], Chief Administrative Law Judge D. Michael Chappell of the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) held that ECM BioFilms, Inc. d/b/a Enviroplastics International (“ECM”) made false and unsubstantiated claims that plastics made with its additive “would completely biodegrade, including in ... May 03, 2014 · ECM Biofilms is also under fire for false claims the FTC alleged it made. That case is pending . A typical claim cited as misleading in APM's marketing materials reads: “Using an additive from ECM Biofllms (ecmbiofllms.com), our biodegradable bags break down completely when in contact with other decomposing materials; in compost bins ... On October 19, 2015, the Federal Trade Commission issued its Final Decision and Order ("Decision") against ECM Biofilms, an Ohio-based company that produces additives used in plastics manufacturing. See In re ECM Biofilms, FTC Docket No. 9358 (Oct. 19, 2015). A copy of ECM's press release concerning that decision is available here .Oct 20, 2015 · ECM Biofilms’ attorney says the FTC’s final order effectively bans the term “biodegradable.” “This is an egregious instance of abuse of agency discretion,” said Jonathan Emord of Emord & Associates, the firm representing ECM Biofilms. Jul 22, 2022 · In the FTC administrative law judge’s January decision, Judge D. Michael Chappell ruled that ECM Biofilms, maker of an additive that accelerates the biodegradation of conventional plastics, had proven the effectiveness of its product based on generally accepted, competent and reliable scientific evidence, including more than 20 gas evolution ... On October 19, 2015, the Federal Trade Commission issued its Final Decision and Order ("Decision") against ECM Biofilms, an Ohio-based company that produces additives used in plastics manufacturing. See In re ECM Biofilms, FTC Docket No. 9358 (Oct. 19, 2015). A copy of ECM's press release concerning that decision is available here .On January 28, 2015, Federal Trade Commission Chief Administrative Law Judge D. Michael Chappell issued a precedent setting decision in the case of FTC v. ECM BioFilms, FTC Docket No. 9358. In his decision, Judge Chappell held ECM’s claim that its plastics additive, ECM Oct 30, 2015 · On October 19, 2015, the Federal Trade Commission sent a message to companies that promote their plastic products as biodegradable – ruling in a case against Ohio-based ECM Biofilms that a claim of biodegradability of a plastic product requires scientific evidence showing that the product will completely decompose within five years. in the ftc administrative law judge's decision, judge d. michael chappell ruled that ecm biofilms, maker of an additive that accelerates the biodegradation of conventional plastics, had proven the effectiveness of its product based on generally accepted, competent and reliable scientific evidence, including over twenty gas evolution tests that …The ECM case is scheduled for trial before an Administrative Law Judge in June 2014, at which ECM and the FTC will likely present evidence on the biodegradation nature of landfills and the suitability of the ATSM D5511 test method. The suitability of ECM’s marketing claims will hang in the balance. ECM Biofilms (ECM), our biodegradable additive manufacturer, has finally settled their dispute with the ... Federal Trade Commission (FTC) regarding how the company can market is biodegradable additive. This is great news as Island Plastic Bags was forced to change its marketing and product information severalOct 23, 2015 · On October 20, 2015, the U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC) issued an opinion and order holding that ECM BioFilms, Inc., a manufacturer of plastic additives, had made false or misleading claims about the biodegradability of plastics containing the additive, but the opinion and order also appeared to retreat from Green Guides standards for biodegradability claims put in place in 2012. The FTC, on the other hand, pointed to thirteen tests that, it alleged, indicate that ECM's additive does not accelerate biodegradation. Both ECM and the FTC relied on surveys to establish consumer...May 03, 2014 · ECM Biofilms is also under fire for false claims the FTC alleged it made. That case is pending . A typical claim cited as misleading in APM's marketing materials reads: “Using an additive from ECM Biofllms (ecmbiofllms.com), our biodegradable bags break down completely when in contact with other decomposing materials; in compost bins ... FTC rules against ECM Biofilms for making false biodegradable claims European Bioplastics is not the only one that is slugging it out with would-be greenwashers; the Federal Trade Commission just fought—and, for now, won—a similar battle in the United States. Karen Laird | Oct 27, 2015FTC rules against ECM Biofilms for making false biodegradable claims European Bioplastics is not the only one that is slugging it out with would-be greenwashers; the Federal Trade Commission just fought—and, for now, won—a similar battle in the United States. Karen Laird | Oct 27, 2015On October 20, 2015, the United States Federal Trade Commission (FTC) released a Final Order with a corresponding Opinion against ECM BioFilms, Inc. (ECM) stating that ECM made false and unsubstantiated environmental claims that its additives for plastics (ECM Plastics) would make treated plastics biodegrade in a landfill. Oct 27, 2015 · FTC rules against ECM Biofilms for making false biodegradable claims European Bioplastics is not the only one that is slugging it out with would-be greenwashers; the Federal Trade Commission just fought—and, for now, won—a similar battle in the United States. Karen Laird | Oct 27, 2015 Oct 30, 2015 · On October 19, 2015, the Federal Trade Commission sent a message to companies that promote their plastic products as biodegradable – ruling in a case against Ohio-based ECM Biofilms that a claim of biodegradability of a plastic product requires scientific evidence showing that the product will completely decompose within five years. ECM Biofilms (ECM), our biodegradable additive manufacturer, has finally settled their dispute with the ... Federal Trade Commission (FTC) regarding how the company can market is biodegradable additive. This is great news as Island Plastic Bags was forced to change its marketing and product information severalRespondent ECM BioFilms, Inc., is an Ohio corporation with its principal office or place of business at Victoria Place, Suite 225, 100 South Park Place, Painesville, OH 44077. 2.Nov 08, 2013 · Below are some examples of companies that the FTC claims have perpetuated false claims about their products. Ohio company faces FTC scrutiny. ECM Biofilms, Inc. is based in Ohio and markets its additives (which allegedly make plastic products biodegradable) under the trade name MasterBatch Pellets. Nov 17, 2015 · ECM Biofilms, a company that produces additives for plastic products, was recently the target of an FTC suit for false advertising. ECM had developed an additive that, when incorporated into plastic, renders the plastic biodegradable, but the FTC claimed in its suit that ECM hadn’t proved its biodegradability. What followed was a trial-type ... Feb 09, 2015 · The Federal Trade Commission’s Chief Administrative Law Judge (ALJ), D. Michael Chappell has issued an initial decision in the case of the FTC versus ECM BioFilms. He ruled that plastics additive manufacturer ECM Biofilms, Inc. violated the FTC Act by deceptively claiming, and providing others with the means to claim, that plastics treated ... Nov 08, 2013 · That is the takeaway from the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) recent six enforcement actions against companies making false claims regarding biodegradability and recyclability. In one case, ECM Biofilms and two of its customers—shopping bag maker American Plastic Manufacturing and golf tee maker CHAMP—were caught making false claims ... ECM BioFilms, FTC Docket No. 9358. In his decision, Judge Chappell held ECM's claim that its plastics additive, ECM MasterBatch Pellets tm, causes plastics to biodegrade was supported by competent and reliable scientific evidence. He rejected FTC's challenge to that claim.On January 28, 2015, Federal Trade Commission Chief Administrative Law Judge D. Michael Chappell issued a precedent setting decision in the case of FTC v. ECM BioFilms, FTC Docket No. 9358. In his decision, Judge Chappell held ECM’s claim that its plastics additive, ECM according to ftc, ecm biofilms claimed during certain time periods that "plastic products made with [its] additives will break down in approximately nine months to five years in nearly all landfills or wherever else they may end up" and at other time periods merely claimed that products containing its additives would degrade in some period …In an Initial Decision announced February 6, 2015, [enhanced version available to lexis.com subscribers], Chief Administrative Law Judge D. Michael Chappell of the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) held that ECM BioFilms, Inc. d/b/a Enviroplastics International (“ECM”) made false and unsubstantiated claims that plastics made with its additive “would completely biodegrade, including in ... On October 20, 2015, the United States Federal Trade Commission (FTC) released a Final Order with a corresponding Opinion against ECM BioFilms, Inc. (ECM) stating that ECM made false and unsubstantiated environmental claims that its additives for plastics (ECM Plastics) would make treated plastics biodegrade in a landfill. ECM BioFilms, FTC Docket No. 9358. In his decision, Judge Chappell held ECM's claim that its plastics additive, ECM MasterBatch Pellets tm, causes plastics to biodegrade was supported by competent and reliable scientific evidence. He rejected FTC's challenge to that claim.Dec 04, 2015 · Petitioner: ECM BIOFILMS, INC, dba Enviroplastics International: Respondent: FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION: Case Number: 15-4339: Filed: December 4, 2015: Court: FTC rules against ECM Biofilms for making false biodegradable claims European Bioplastics is not the only one that is slugging it out with would-be greenwashers; the Federal Trade Commission just fought—and, for now, won—a similar battle in the United States. Karen Laird | Oct 27, 2015WASHINGTON, Dec. 9, 2015 /PRNewswire/ -- On December 8, 2015, the Federal Trade Commission granted ECM BioFilms' request to stay the Commission's Final Order in the matter of ECM BioFilms, FTC...Petitioner: ECM BIOFILMS, INC, dba Enviroplastics International: Respondent: FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION: Case Number: 15-4339: Filed: December 4, 2015: Court:Nov 17, 2015 · ECM Biofilms, a company that produces additives for plastic products, was recently the target of an FTC suit for false advertising. ECM had developed an additive that, when incorporated into plastic, renders the plastic biodegradable, but the FTC claimed in its suit that ECM hadn’t proved its biodegradability. What followed was a trial-type ... /PRNewswire/ -- On January 28, 2015, Federal Trade Commission Chief Administrative Law Judge D. Michael Chappell issued a precedent setting decision in the...in an initial decision announced today, the federal trade commission’s chief administrative law judge (alj), d. michael chappell, ruled that plastics additive manufacturer ecm biofilms, inc. violated the ftc act by deceptively claiming, and providing others with the means to claim, that plastics treated with ecm additives (ecm plastics) would … One company in particular, ECM Biofilms, Inc., also used its own “Certificates of Biodegradability of Plastic Products” and provided deceptive marketing materials to distributors. The FTC also announced an enforcement action against AJM Packaging Corporation, a paper goods company, in violation of a pre-existing 1994 consent order barring ... On October 20, 2015, the United States Federal Trade Commission (FTC) released a Final Order with a corresponding Opinion against ECM BioFilms, Inc. (ECM) stating that ECM made false and unsubstantiated environmental claims that its additives for plastics (ECM Plastics) would make treated plastics biodegrade in a landfill. May 03, 2014 · ECM Biofilms is also under fire for false claims the FTC alleged it made. That case is pending . A typical claim cited as misleading in APM's marketing materials reads: “Using an additive from ECM Biofllms (ecmbiofllms.com), our biodegradable bags break down completely when in contact with other decomposing materials; in compost bins ... On January 28, 2015, Federal Trade Commission Chief Administrative Law Judge D. Michael Chappell issued a precedent setting decision in the case of FTC v. ECM BioFilms, FTC Docket No. 9358. In his decision, Judge Chappell held ECM’s claim that its plastics additive, ECM ECM BioFilms, FTC Docket No. 9358. In his decision, Judge Chappell held ECM's claim that its plastics additive, ECM MasterBatch Pellets tm, causes plastics to biodegrade was supported by competent and reliable scientific evidence. He rejected FTC's challenge to that claim.On October 20, 2015, the United States Federal Trade Commission (FTC) released a Final Order with a corresponding Opinion against ECM BioFilms, Inc. (ECM) stating that ECM made false and unsubstantiated environmental claims that its additives for plastics (ECM Plastics) would make treated plastics biodegrade in a landfill. Dec 04, 2015 · Petitioner: ECM BIOFILMS, INC, dba Enviroplastics International: Respondent: FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION: Case Number: 15-4339: Filed: December 4, 2015: Court: ECM Biofilms, Inc. Settles with FTC May 2017 Written By: Adrian Hong ECM Biofilms (ECM), our biodegradable additive manufacturer, has finally settled their dispute with the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) regarding how the company can market is biodegradable additive. This Nov 16, 2015 · Recently the Federal Trade Commission found that ECM BioFilms made false and unsubstantiated environmental claims about its chemical additive product. What makes this opinion notable is the ... Respondent ECM BioFilms, Inc., is an Ohio corporation with its principal office or place of business at Victoria Place, Suite 225, 100 South Park Place, Painesville, OH 44077. 2.ECM BioFilms, FTC Docket No. 9358. In his decision, Judge Chappell held ECM's claim that its plastics additive, ECM MasterBatch Pellets tm, causes plastics to biodegrade was supported by competent and reliable scientific evidence. He rejected FTC's challenge to that claim. pet sitters near mewhat county is yucca valley indude perfect happy tour reviewjcc pool scheduleblack goldendoodle puppy pricedisneyland cast member costumescraigslist vancouver washington wantedifbb pro steroidsaccident st clements oxfordaccident in harker heights todaygoodwill textile recycling near texasswedish issaquah neurologyrh baby and child locationscalifornia family law discovery cutofffake boyfriend moviedefensive behaviourtype of romance with photoupper right side back pain when breathingdifference between plastic surgeon and dermatologistnarcissist support group edmontonis your face symmetricalcan you be forced to donate blood xp